Slings are often chosen based on factors other than width alone, and those factors can dramatically narrow down your width options. If you’re looking only for the lightest and most compact slings, then 8 mm and under is your range. Otherwise, to find the best sling, you can start making width choices based on the following factors:

  • intended use
  • material type
  • handling / dexterity
  • price
  • weight
  • mental comfort

Quick note: This post is really focused on sewn-slings. So we don’t go over on the pros/cons of tied 1″ webbing.

Intended Use / Material Restrictions

Generally speaking, the best use for nylon slings is for anchors and the best use for Dyneema slings is alpine (extendable) draws (if you want to dive deeper into the pros and cons of sling materials, check out our sling materials post). If you follow those rules of thumb you’ll be limited to certain widths by the material.

Since nylon has a much lower strength to weight ratio than Dyneema, nylon slings are not available under 1/2″ widths. And conversely, slings that include Dyneema (or Dynex/Spectra), won’t be found on slings over 5/8″.

This graph shows the number of options based on each width and notes the material make-up (for the 300+ slings seen on WeighMyRack in March 2016):

Slings Widths for 300 Climbing Slings Dyneema Nylon

Handling / Dexterity

The skinnier the sling the easier it is to twist, bend, fold and manipulate. That said, a sling can be so skinny that big hands (or gloved hands) can have trouble grabbing hold. The perfect balance between flexibility and bulk is a personal decision and will differ depending on the intended use. Rule of thumb: alpine slings require more dexterity (less width) while anchors can be bulkier with minimal negative effect.

It is also important to note that slings that include polyester instead of nylon are slightly stiffer than their nylon cousins as this will also affect the handling. This is another reason why we recommend handling different width slings in-store or on your friends rack before making a purchasing decision.

Relative to a big ol’ 8 inch hand, this is how each main sling width compares:

sling width comparison with hand


Generally the less Dyneema, the cheaper it is. Pure nylon slings are the cheapest with nylon blends (more equal ratio of nylon and Dyneema) being a close second. Also generally speaking, the skinnier the sling the more expensive it is.

If you’re looking to minimize price, the 16 mm width range will have the best deals since they’re almost exclusively made of nylon (or polyester, but nylon is currently cheaper), and this width has saturated the market so prices are low.

For alpine slings, the best bang for your buck is the 12-14 mm (~1/2″) for hybrid Dyneema/nylon blends. This range still has nice handling characteristics and doesn’t have a large price jump from the strictly nylon offerings. And, the 9-11 mm (~7/16″) range for Dyneema slings is also a good spot if you’re looking to slightly bias weight over pricing.

We graphed all the widths and prices for all the single (~60 cm / 24″) slings in our database to help get a visual:

Everything There is to Know About Sling Widths 1

*Worth noting: While it seems that most single slings are considered 60 cm / 24″ there is some deviation in length options offered by the manufactures. Due to this variance, we label “single” slings lengths as 50 cm to 80 cm.

This data was pulled in March 2016, and included widths and prices for 92 different single slings from 24 different brands.


You don’t need a graph to know that a smaller width sling will weigh less (with a few exceptions), but how much difference does a few millimeters of material really make?

For single slings (~60cm / 24″), the min weight is a scant 16 grams while the max weight is 80 grams. That’s a huge range, and makes the debate seem more black and white than it really is. If you’ve already decided on a sling width, surely the weight range is much smaller, right?

In grams, here’s how the weights play out for each width range listed on WeighMyRack:

Single Sling Width vs Weight

We were surprised to see the max weight for the 5/8″ range lower than the max weight for the 1/2″ range. This is because of Mammut’s 80 cm slings (again, we are comparing all “single” slings which includes lengths from 50 cm to 80 cm). Turns out that Mammut’s 13 mm Crocodile Sling uses a slightly “fatter” webbing which is slightly heavier than their 16 mm Tubular Sling.

Geeking out a little further, if you took 12 slings (of average weight for each given width) on a climb, the weight differences really start to add up. This table shows the +147.6 g weight jump moving from 7/16″ Dyneema slings to 1/2″ hybrid slings and another big jump of +117.6 g when moving to 5/8″ nylon slings.


*Weight data was pulled in March 2016, and included widths and weights for 90 different single slings from 21 different brands with single slings between 50 cm and 80 cm.

Mental Comfort

Our brains tell us that the skinnier the sling, the less weight it’ll hold, it’s an easy to understand pattern. Even when we know that, regardless of sling width, the sling certification test is exactly the same and all certified slings are rated to hold 22kN, that won’t necessarily stop your brain from telling you skinny slings are scary. If this is the case, the answer is simple: don’t buy slings 8 mm (5/16″) or narrower. There is no reason to be second guessing your gear instead of focusing on the climb.

After a big internet hoopla about a broken 8mm sling, Mammut conducted an intensive study and concluded:

Climbers should be aware that all slings, whether skinny or fat, Dyneema/Spectra or Nylon, are susceptible to significant strength loss due to a girth hitch, and should use any connecting knots with caution. While there may be some additional strength loss when connecting skinnier slings, this additional loss is only a few percent (the equivalent of perhaps 250 lbs out of 5000)–the additional strength loss is not enough to treat today’s extremely thin slings any differently than fatter or nylon slings—all girth hitches must be treated with caution. The safest way to obtain a longer sling is to use a longer sling in the first place, rather than connecting them at all. If two slings must be joined, the strongest way to do so is with a carabiner.

Knots in slings is a little off-topic for this post, and we mention it only as it relates to sling width. We dive into much more detail about knots and provide more links and references in our post explaining the difference between nylon, Dyneema, and polyester.


We list 5 width ranges on WeighMyRack to filter slings. Here is the rule of thumb for each, considering the above information.

This is the best option if weight is your top concern and you’re willing to pay a premium for the least weight. It’s also important that you don’t mind your slings looking incredibly skinny.
The most common width of Dyneema / Spectra / Dynex slings. Overall these are the most reasonably priced if you’re leaning towards skinny slings with great handling and are willing to pay a slightly higher price but don’t want to break the bank.
These slings offer the greatest balance between low price and low weight. You can still get a sling with Dyneema / Spectra / Dynex, but it’ll include up to 60% nylon or polyester which reduces the price (and increases the width).
This is the value size. They’re a little heavier and bulkier than the narrower (Dyneema/Dynex/Spectra) options as they’re almost entirely made of nylon or polyester. These are great for anchors. They can still work for alpine slings, but they are a bit more cumbersome.
over 18 mm (~3/4″+)
If price is your primary concern and you like the look of beefy slings, and you’re willing to deal with the extra bulk, then these should be your slings of choice. Really, they’re nice for anchors, but can be inconvenient and awkward for other uses.


Alison Dennis

Alison Dennis

Alison (she/her) runs WeighMyRack from her 17' travel trailer. She is currently touring the US and would love if you contacted her to meet up to talk about climbing, climbing gear, or if you have any fun and/or ridiculous adventure in mind.

All author posts

We’re @weighmyrack


Get Climbing Gear News

You can expect 0 – 52 updates per year.

About Us

We’re a bunch of gear nerds who set out to level the playing field. Screw the media bias of marketing budgets, we treat all brands equally. You won’t find elitist or gatekeeping writing here, we welcome all climbers.


When we write specific place names we will give a land acknowledgement.
To avoid assumptions we’ll ask to share gender pronouns.

Our Location

We’re often mobile. Do inquire for a current shipping address.

Our business address is:
30 N Gould St
Suite 23131
Sheridan, Wyoming 82801

Instead of featuring distracting ads or creating a paywall to monetize our site, Weigh My Rack LLC links to relevent products via affiliate marketing (if you click a link and then buy, we get a commission). Weigh My Rack LLC is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Weigh My Rack LLC also participates in affiliate programs with Avantlink, AWIN, Bergfruende, CJ, FlexOffers, Webgains, and other sites.